This comes from Neues Europa blogspot, and can be found here: https://nseuropa.blogspot.com/2021/01/one-must-overcome-dead-point.html?m=1 and has been archived by Ava Wolfe on her excellent substack.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Source: SS Leilheft, 1944, Issue 1 “S”
What is expressed in the following company commander’s field letter should be taken literally. It is about you and me, it affects all of us very personally:
…Despite the hardness of these days we look into the future with confidence. But one uncanny realization often plagues me, namely that the full, in the final sense absolute unconditionality of this war is still completely clear to far too few Europeans. Indeed, it gets around more and more. But the full hardness of the war grips only far too few.
The Bolshevik wants to move west, and with him strides death – for all of us, without exception. We fight over existence or non-existence – all of us, whether we live in the Reich or in Europe’s lands. What threatens us from the east is total destruction of everything we are, however one may label it. And the Russian is strong, especially in the one thing that has previously always decided all conflicts: attitude. He is so fantastically healthy that even the Bolshevik poison could not hurt him. Rather it works like a fission-fungus, which sets the resting forces into motion, that now follow their law blind and unstoppable. Bolshevism, in the formerly poor Russian history, is a very great event, something that has moved the wide masses of this huge folk and still moves it. The Russians go into this war unencumbered. We carry a rich heritage with us, and it burdens us.
It is like the Führer once said: The last battalion triumphs; in other words, whoever fires the last shot, has won, regardless how the game otherwise looks and where this last German shot strikes. Who five minutes after twelve can still aim his rifle at the enemy ready to fire, has won, even if he stands as one against a thousand.
Bitter weeks lie behind me, weeks full of horrible experience. But we soldiers here in the east learn a tremendous self-consciousness and sobriety over ourselves. Here we become cleaner, better, harder, healthier. The soldiers who have already held out for over three years in Russia, those are the best men of our folk, by far the best. It is so: one should no longer train recruits in German barracks with shower rooms, beds, lockers etc., rather in filthy nests on the east. One should no longer assemble German divisions in Western Europe, rather in the occupied east.
Recently I picked up two men separated from their unit, who had been in the Hague just ten days before. It is completely clear to us here that at first not much can be expected from such people, regardless how well equipped they may be. It is really a shame about what all is lost in the first fighting. This view spreads more and more. Even troop units that have been in the homeland for a longer time for replenishment or training are no longer worth as much as if they had never been there. One must first overcome the “dead point”; one must unlearn looking back, one must learn that the path to a real and genuine life only follows the detour over the defeat of the opponent, that there is no going back.
The homeland is too beautiful for us; it makes us sick, slack, soft. That has nothing to do with the mood at home. Rather it is the safety, the measuredness of all life to our being, that is what makes us so sick when we return to the Russian misery, to the loneliness and desolation of pitiless demand, which has probably only been so absolutely imposed on the Athenians in their struggle against Sparta, or Caesar in his fight against Vereingetorix.
One must understand that, also purely emotionally, otherwise one succumbs to the tremendous pressure that rests on one spiritually. When one understands that, this pressure disappears immediately. In its place comes the ice-cold, active will to get at the enemy and to beat him at any price. During my various assignments I have become acquainted with very diverse divisions; some who have been in Russia without interruption since 1941, some in Germany during the war and some that were assembled in France. The last ones are the ones who find it the hardest to get used to the unconditionality of the Russian land in order to gain a clear view for the gigantic possibilities of these expanses, which wait there for European formative energy.
In each head haunts: “Back then in France!”, instead of saying: “Here I am, here I remain – and if it is not so nice here, then it will become nice, that is why I am who I am!” The last, unfortunately, is only said by far too few. If we would firmly bite into the Russian earth – the Soviets would never get rid of us. But, unfortunately, only a few firmly bite in here; others dream about the end of the war at home, but not the end of the war as a free man in the east. And that is a big shame. That is what must come. At that moment the Russian can try whatever he wants; he will not advance an inch…”
If we see the old world in ruins, we do not ask a lot whether much valuable and irreplaceable was lost! That makes sad and weakens the fighting strength. Let us ask ourselves instead whether we still feel within us a spark of that energy that enables us to erect the Reich from flesh and blood. If that is the case – and I know that the best of us possess this rock-hard faith -, then we will also have the strength to build anew the high works where no old wall will still hinders us – in the expanses of the east and over the ruins of the west. Cathedrals fall, their holy substance lives on indestructible in our blood. So we are free for the struggle and will later be free to, in accordance with the eternal substance, to build the new castles of a new time.
3 Responses
Wollte Hitler die Welt erobern? Um es kurz zu machen. Es gibt zwei Hauptargumente dagegen. Hitler suchte nach der Revision des Versailler Diktates. In erster Linie war das, Deutschen aus ehemals deutschen Gebieten ihre Heimat zurückzugeben. Er verzichtete allerdings im Westen vollständig auf diese Revision, weil er dort den Frieden suchte. Wir erinnern uns, nach dem ersten Weltkrieg wurden deutsche Gebiete an Frankreich, Belgien und Dänemark abgetreten. Selbst gegenüber Polen vertrat Hitler eine Appeasement Politik, wurde aber durch hochaggressive Provokationen (Völkermord) und schließlich die polnische Mobilmachung gezwungen zum Waffengang. Hätte Hitler den Weltkrieg gewollt, hätte er ihn konsequent vorbereitet. Im Nebenergebnis hätte er sowieso alle deutschen Gebiete besessen. Warum also mühevoll verhandeln und Zeit verschwenden, wenn er doch Weltdiktator werden wollte? Das zweite Argument ist darin zu sehen, daß Hitler den Ausgleich und einen Frieden mit dem Britisch Empire suchte. Warum auf 1/4 der Landmasse verzichten, wenn er doch die Welteroberung suchte? Stalin und Roosevelt waren Konkurrenten im Kampf um die Welt. Stalin erstrebte die bolschewistische Weltrepublik und Roosevelt übernahm in einer Art kalten Staatsstreich das britische Empire. Danach trat ein, was Hitler vorausgesagt hatte, es gab zwei Blöcke und den Kalten Krieg. Churchill hatte das Empire verspielt.
Translation of Hilken’s comment:
Did Hitler want to conquer the world? To put it briefly, there are two main arguments against this. Hitler sought to revise the Treaty of Versailles. His primary aim was to return their homelands to Germans living in formerly German territories. However, he completely abandoned this aim in the West because he was seeking peace there. We recall that, following the First World War, German territories were ceded to France, Belgium and Denmark. Even towards Poland, Hitler pursued a policy of appeasement, but was forced into armed conflict by highly aggressive provocations (genocide) and, ultimately, the Polish mobilisation. Had Hitler wanted a world war, he would have prepared for it systematically. As a side effect, he would have possessed all German territories anyway. So why go to the trouble of negotiating and wasting time if he wanted to become the dictator of the world? The second argument lies in the fact that Hitler sought a compromise and peace with the British Empire. Why give up a quarter of the landmass if he was seeking world conquest? Stalin and Roosevelt were rivals in the struggle for world domination. Stalin strove for a Bolshevik world republic, whilst Roosevelt took over the British Empire in a sort of cold coup d’état. What followed was exactly what Hitler had predicted: there were two blocs and the Cold War. Churchill had squandered the Empire.
When I was much, much younger I became familiar about the Lend Lease program President Roosevelt put in place to allow Britain to purchase military supplies on generous credit in order for them to pursue their war aims against National Socialist Germany. But what I was not aware of for many number of years concerned the fact that after Germany attacked the Soviet Union in order to prevent the Soviets from invading Germany and ultimately conquering all of western Europe was the realization that a similar but much more prolific Lend Lease program was (quietly) devised to assist the Soviets as well. Undoubtedly, it was this latter that allowed the Soviets to eventually overcome their considerable disadvantage against the superior German forces and thus turn the tide in their favor. Allow me to put this into simple layman terms and clear away the dense fog of politics and ideology: The real “nuts & bolts” of that terrible war was really fought in the east rather then in the west. As a consequence of this, communism won the day, gained much territory and set in motion the horrendous (and expensive) Cold War that would eat up countless billions and trillions of dollars and indebt the “taxpayers” of the west from that wars end and continuing on for many, many generations well into our common present and future. More so, it solidified in place what we now call the “military industrial complex” – today a weapon primarily a jewish controlled institution keeping us all enslaved (and financially subservient) to their whims, follies, and their perverse “holier-then-thou”, God’s chosen superiority complex. In other words: classic jewish derangement syndrome. Consequently, they own us – and continue to bleed us dry. Hubris personified. Our cities decay into third-world shitholes, infrastructure deteriorates, our social fabric and cultures become more degraded and deranged, and we in the west continue to be swindled willingly by this dominating class of useless nonproductive, parasitic elites and misfits – stealing/sacrificing our wealth, ideas and the endeavors of our progeny. Simply, they grow richer and we grow poorer. The physical results speak for themselves.
As it is now public knowledge Roosevelt was heavily “influenced” by jews within his administration, one can assume (with a little rational thinking) this support for the communists and the conquest of the Germans was very much a central part of their plan. An entirely different narrative would have prevailed had Germany defeated the communists, freed up the Russian people of the tyranny they were living under. (Think of the Holodomor and the tens of millions of Orthodox Christians murdered by the Soviet jews – the real HOLOCAUST we are not allowed to talk about.) More German forces could have been focused upon defending western Europe against western jewish tyranny, and perhaps we would all be living in a much better, more beautiful and less ugly, degraded world from the one we currently reside. At least, taking all eventualities into account, that is how it plays out for me.
And now, we come to the present-day situation with regards to both Russia and Ukraine, and the perverse historical narrative(s) they both continue to live within. And we, the controlled, manipulated “tax peasants” of the west whom must continue to endure this insanity and pay for it via our blood, toil and our ever-evolving, conditioned sense of self.
With Russia today more democratic then any nation here in the west – after discarding its bleak multi-decades of communist jewish “hell-on-earth” and returning to its Orthodox Christian roots – the jews are at it again attempting to undermine Russian stability by using Ukraine as its proxy. Ukraine, having known the worst of Soviet (jewish) behavior from the nineteen thirties and again after World War II for their support for the liberating Germans that briefly freed them from the jewish yoke are caught within yet another jewish instigated tyranny. Having lost Russia to Christianity they want to once again destroy Christian Russia and bring it back under their absolute control. Instead of leaving the Ukrainian nation alone to grow and prosper as a peace-loving, mostly orthodox and culturally-linked people historically much connected spiritually and physically to greater Russia, the jews have once again mostly burdened upon Ukraine what they are essentially only good for: CHAOS. Just where is the rightness of mind in all this?
Just as was the case during World War II, Ukranian cities are being leveled and much historic, iconic architecture flattened into rubble. So it seems to be the fate now for the great, ancient Persian nation, Iran, as I was intimately/personally recently made aware of via friends in Iran that two exquisite educational centers the architectural firm I worked for (and worked on) years ago were recently flattened. Educational facilities – imagine that? As history begs us to remember; Gaza, southern Lebanon and many parts of Syria seem to follow the same fate as Berlin, Dresden, Hamburg and countless others. The once most stable and prosperous nation in northern Africa, Libya, is today an ongoing nightmare of chaos, ruin, waste and division.
With a jewish controlled congress and president here in my own country, and no doubt the same for nearly all of the governments of western Europe they are at it once again. It seems simply their innate nature, as they seem totally useless for anything else where culture and high civilizational standards are concerned. And while they sow hatred and chaos in eastern Europe let us not forget that other “hell on earth” they have continually perpetrated within occupied Palestine since 1947, and all of the rest of the Middle East.
Will we in the west ever truly awaken to this ongoing curse upon decent humanity? Perhaps Herr Hitler was so very right in wanting to provide them a “homeland” of their own and far removed from those of us throughout the rest of the world whom wish to be free of their treacherous, parasitic and manipulative, condescending ways. Perhaps there might be a few who could live amongst us if they behaved, but I sincerely doubt it in the long term. It is just who they are, by nature. And so, the nightmare continues……..
Frederick D. Medler