This article was originally published in 2016 on the Republic Broadcasting Network website, and can be found here: https://republicbroadcasting.org/news/british-ministry-of-truth-said-in-1944-that-the-holocaust-must-be-created-to-distract-from-ussr-massacres/
Original Title:
British Ministry of Truth Said in 1944 That the Holocaust Must be Created to Distract from USSR Massacres
“There exists no document signed by Hitler, Himmler, or Heydrich speaking of exterminating Jews… and, the word ‘extermination’ does not appear in the letter from Herman Goering to Heydrich concerning the Final Solution of the Jewish question.”
Shocking 1944 British government letter
This is a February 29, 1944 letter to the BBC and higher members of the British clergy, from the British Ministry of Information. It lays out in no uncertain terms the following:
We all know the crimes committed by the Bolsheviks over the last 24 years in Russia and Eastern Europe
It is inevitable they will do the same in Central Europe
We will cover up their crimes by lying about the Germans
The public is not as stupid as it was, our lies will be better
You (BBC & Church) must spread these lies, convincingly
Sir,
I am directed by the Ministry to send you the following circular letter:
It is often the duty of the good citizens and of the pious Christians to turn a blind eye on the peculiarities of those associated with us.But the time comes when such peculiarities, while still denied in public, must be taken into account when action by us is called for.
We know the methods of rule employed by the Bolshevik dictator in Russia itself from, for example, the writing and speeches of the Prime Minister himself during the last twenty years. We know how the Red Army behaved in Poland in 1920 and in Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Galicia and Bessarabia only recently.
We must, therefore, take into account how the Red Army will certainly behave when it overruns Central Europe. Unless precautions are taken, the obviously inevitable horrors which will result will throw an undue strain on public opinion in this country.
We cannot reform the Bolsheviks but we can do our best to save them — and ourselves — from the consequences of their acts. The disclosures of the past quarter of a century will render mere denials unconvincing. The only alternative to denial is to distract public attention from the whole subject.
Experience has shown that the best distraction is atrocity propaganda directed against the enemy. Unfortunately the public is no longer so susceptible as in the days of the “Corpse Factory,” and the “Mutilated Belgian Babies,” and the “Crucified Canadians.”
Your cooperation is therefore earnestly sought to distract public attention from the doings of the Red Army by your wholehearted support of various charges against the Germans and Japanese which have been and will be put into circulation by the Ministry.
Your expression of belief in such may convince others.
I am, Sir, Your obedient servant, (signed) H. HEWET, ASSISTANT SECRETARY
The Ministry can enter into no correspondence of any kind with regard to this communication which should only be disclosed to responsible persons.
This letter is reproduced in a 1958 book entitled: Allied Wartime Diplomacy: A Pattern in Poland by Edward J. Rozek.
The British ‘Ministry of Truth’ is/was actually the British Ministry of Information, which excelled at disseminating propaganda aimed at Germany during WWII, including the almost immediate UNAUTHORIZED rejection of Hitler’s offer of peace terms in 1940 to England instead of all-out war.
Compare the nastiness of Delmer’s rejection of Hitler’s peace in 1940 with Hitler politely declining an offer by Delmer to give his opinions on the state of the British financial crisis in 1931.
Denis Sefton Delmer , a Jew journalist working for the BBC, was the one who went on the air and rejected the offer in rather nasty terms.
Comment from “Radio Islam”
This is quite an astounding document. This letter is ample evidence that during World War II, the Allies used atrocity propaganda against Hitler Germany to distract their own people from the atrocities being committed primarily but not exclusively by the Red Army – their “comrades”! – in the invasion of Europe as Hitler’s war drew to an end.Note, though, that there was nothing in this letter that talked of gassing people.
Why not? Because foolish atrocity propaganda is something else again. The gas chamber claim was floated briefly as a propaganda test kite but was quickly abandoned as too “unbelievable.” If atrocity fiction is found to be so gross, outlandish and implausible that thinking, feeling people simply cannot swallow it, it is not in an army leader’s interest to peddle such a “crime.”
This was the case originally with the “gas chamber” claim.
In point of fact, the British Ministry of Information at first requested British clergy to help spread the “gas chamber” story which was planned to be put in circulation by the Ministry. (Rozek, Edward J., Allied Wartime Diplomacy, pp 108-110. John Wiley and Sons, New York ) However, from the start, it was judged to be too problematic and bizarre and, therefore, it was quickly withdrawn as a potential strategic embarrassment.
Some of the “lesser” so-called “crimes” that people were willing to swallow did survive and thrive for a while, both during World War I and World War II – some of them for longer periods than others.
For example, many of the older generation, both in Europe and America, still vividly remember the macabre World War I Allied propaganda claims of the German “. . . cadavers-into-soap factories,” the “. . . chopped-off hands of Belgian babies,” the “. . . crucified Canadian soldier” stories – all of which proved to be lies, and for some of which post WWI Allied statesmen even apologized to the Germans….
Let us be very clear on one point: There would have been no hesitation to use the story of the “gassings” even during the war – had it been plausible. However, even during the war, the leadership of the Allied Nations – such as Churchill and Roosevelt as well as those of the Catholic hierarchy, including the then-Pope Pius XI – knew from their various intelligence agencies, spies on the ground, inmates with radio transmitters inside various camps (including inmate soldiers, inmate priests, even those who took confessions of local military, police and guard personnel) that no organized mass exterminations by gassing or any other means were going on inside these camps.
How did they know?
The Allied leaders had detailed aerial photos, none of which corroborated the hysterical claims then made by Zionist agitators like Rabbi Stephen Wise and others around the world. It simply wasn’t true. There were no gassings of people going on – only of lice! The story was a cheese with many, many holes. And it was judged as problematic.
As a consequence, the Allied leadership specifically removed any reference to “gas chambers” in their wartime atrocity propaganda, even in their diplomatic dispatches, because there was no proof. (Allied Diplomacy in Wartime, Samisdat Resource Book, pp 108-110)
Standard Oil of New Jersey had been working with the German firm I.G. Farben to develop synthetic gasoline and rubber from coal. When WWII broke out, Standard Oil was forbidden from working with their German counterparts on the rubber project, but Standard was woefully behind the German’s on this project.
So they got the Department of War to do regular intelligence photo flights over the I.G. Farben complex at Auschwitz to see if they could gather some hints as to how Germany was processing the coal into rubber.
NONE of those flight’s photos showed any death camp or piles of bodies or people being herded into gas chambers for a simple reason; The Holocaust is a hoax.
This is a picture the Holocaust™ junkies don’t want you to see. It’s the IG Farben factory in Monowitz, a few miles away from Auschwitz that used slave labor from Auschwitz during WWII. Germans needed alive prisoners to work in these factories, necessitating a hospital at Auschwitz to keep the POW’s in good health for work.
IG Farben factory in Monowitz near Auschwitz
5 Responses
Hello Monika.
Here’s whom these masters of deception had gotten a hold of in England. From the book ‘Revolt on the Clyde’ William Gallacher. 1937.
We (munitions workers) took a ballot
Vote of members in Scotland on the question of the wage award and the ballot decided to down tools.
“We then called a strike for 15th September, 1917, in which all shops in Scotland participated”. The dispute lasted for three weeks and a few days and terminated as the result of a joint deputation from emegency commitee and E.C. of union meeting the minister of labor in London. Previous to this (Mr.) Bell and I had visited London and interviewed Winston Churchill, who was the minister of munitions, and Churchill then gave the assurance that if we returned to work he would see that consideration was given to our position. P. 173
(There was opposition to the labour party which represented the munition workers and wanted no more war and withdrew there coalition with the labour party. The book goes on)
This was a bitter pill for Henderson and the “Social Patriots” and a clear indication of the strength of the anti war Movement in Scotland.
In the meantime stirring news was coming through from Russia. The “Soviets” of workers and soldiers were assuming ever greater and greater importance. The Bolshevic slogan “All power to the Soviets” was widely welcomed along the Clyde. p.174
I thought I would share that with you.
War and Lies go hand in hand.
God Bless you Monica and The Truth and Justice for Germans society.
Thank you “outside looking in” for this contribution, and may you also be blessed.
Thank you Monika, you see, the communist had gotten a hold of labor in England, the book goes on-
While Brailsford in the Herald was proclaiming the coming of disaster as a consequence of Bolshevik activity, the workers on the Clyde were already conscious of the fact that the Russian workers had to seize and hold on to power if the revolution was to be saved. Then came November and the Bolshevik revolution. While all the labour leaders, including Lansbury, remained silent about this world-shaking event, the Clyde workers received the news with a wild shout of Joy. p. 174
Rudolph Hess parachuted into this region with his message of Peace during WW2. Now you know part of the reason why they imprisoned, silenced and murdered him. RIP Rudolph Hess.
This same activity was happening in Germany during WW1, non-German reds were trying to undermine labor there as well, coupled with aliens in power and influence in German media, had lead to the direct animus of the WW1 German veterans to create racial laws preventing that subversion from ever happening to Germany again. Unfortunately, a good portion of the people in England were still brainwashed and under the spell of Bolshevik lies that go on to this day.
I didn’t mean to go off topic, I just wanted to show the beginnings of the subversion of England.
Thank you again Monika, you are a blessing to the world.
Stay strong and know that you are always in my thoughts and prayers.
Einige Zionisten trafen sich am 19.01.1944 in Palästina, und am 21. veröffentlichte die Zeitung Haaretz die von ihnen bestimmte Zahl von 6 Millionen toter Juden. Am 04.07.1944 setzte sich die Geschichte in England fort. Angeblich wären aus dem Lager Auschwitz vier inhaftierte Juden und Augenzeugen geflohen, auf deren Behauptungen die Aussage beruht, daß dort Juden industriell vergast würden, und zwar 12.000 pro Tag. Merkwürdig, daß Churchill diese Aussage sofort ungeprüft benutzte und als größtes Verbrechen aller Zeiten aufgriff. Es gäbe überhaupt keinen Zweifel an einer wissenschaftlichen Massenvernichtung, man werde die Täter jagen und abstrafen. Warum haben zu diesem Zeitpunkt die Alliierten keine militärische Befreiungsmaßnahme ergriffen? Immerhin wurde gerade eine deutsche Stadt nach der anderen in Schutt und Asche gelegt. Man hätte also wohl ohne weitere ein Luftlandekorps am Lager aussetzen und dieses militärisch befreien können. Dann hätte man sofort ein überwältigendes Beweismaterial gehabt. Warum ließ Churchill sich diese einmalige Chance entgehen? Der Nationalsozialismus wäre blitzartig beim deutschen Volk erledigt gewesen. Es wäre kein so großer Aufwand und kaum noch ein Risiko bei der erreichten Lufthoheit der Angloamerikaner gewesen. Man hätte alles fotografisch und filmisch dokumentieren und der Weltpresse mitteilen können. Auch konnte man die unverschlüsselte Kommunikation zwischen der Lagerkommandantur und dem Reichssicherheitshauptamt ohne Probleme mitlesen. Eine derartige Logistik wie die Ermordung von Millionen Menschen im Lager hätte nicht verborgen bleiben können. Auch der Meister des Geheimnisverrates Canaris, der doch sonst jedes Detail an die Engländer preisgab, hatte hierzu geschwiegen. Doch Churchill unterließ jede Veröffentlichung von Beweisen oder auch nur die kleinste Befreiungsmaßnahme und nutzte die Info nicht einmal für eine großangelegte Propagandainitiative. Luftbilder, die die Behauptungen leicht hätten unterstreichen können. Keine Luftaufklärung der Briten? Rauchfahnen. Kohlehaufen. Abraumhalden. Menschenschlangen. In den nahegelegenen IG-Farben BUNA-Werken in Monowice haben bis zu 80.000 Arbeiter an der Fabrikation von künstlichem Gummi gearbeitet. Man baut nicht eine riesige Fabrik, wenn das Ziel Vernichtung der Arbeiter ist. Es ergibt sich hier ein Widerspruch zwischen einer wertigen Produktion in einer kriegswichtigen Industrie und einer industriellen Tötung. Arbeiter müssen in eine komplexe chemische Produktion eingearbeitet werden. Das sind Ressourcen, die 1944 schon äußerst knapp waren. Diese Einarbeitung wird ebenso sinnlos wie der Bau einer Fabrik, wenn Mord das Ziel ist. Wenn sie nicht ausreichend Essen bekommen, können sie keine Arbeitsleistung bringen. Es ergibt sich ein Widerspruch zum Totarbeiten von Menschen und einer gesteigerten Produktion eines Stoffes, der im Krieg elementar benötigt wird. Das Umfeld, die Bevölkerung in Lagernähe war ahnungslos, es gab keine diesbezüglichen Gerüchte, was schon bemerkenswert ist, bei den Massenbewegungen von Juden, die das vorausgesetzt haben würde. Im Umfeld viele Katholiken, die zur Beichte gingen. Warum stieß die Katholische Kirche keinen Notruf ab? Millionen von Ankommenden – und kein Zeuge in der Nachbarschaft? Warum das Foreign Office dem überhaupt nicht nachging und der Premierminister vier vorgeblichen Zeugen apodiktisch Glauben schenkte? Es handelte sich beim britischen Geheimdienst um einen der besten der Welt. Wo ist die Dokumentation der Zeugenaussagen? Wo ist die Verifikation ihrer Aussagen? Warum wurde nicht sofort eine task force berufen? Warum wurden der Weltöffentlichkeit nicht unverzüglich Beweise vorgelegt? Man hätte sich die Lügen und das Hetzen sparen können. Hier wäre doch Greuelpropaganda mit echten Greueln zuhauf gewesen. Warum wartete man, bis die Russen am 27.01.1945 in Auschwitz eintrafen tatenlos ab? 207 Tage, in denen nichts geschah und täglich 12.000 Menschen ermordet worden wären? Das wären – diese genannten Zahlen zugrundelegend – knapp 2,5 Millionen Auschwitz-Ermordete. Das würde bedeuten, daß Churchill der Komplize von deutschen Mördern gewesen wäre. Daß er die Nationalsozialisten bei ihrem verbrecherischen Tun gedeckt hätte. Da die Briten die Codierung entschlüsselt hatten, konnten sie auch etwaige geheime Kommunikation der Konzentrationslager mitlesen. Leider gibt es auch hier nichts. Eine derartige logistische Herausforderung sollte kein Papier hervorgebracht haben? Keine Mordbefehle? Keine Befehlsketten? (Und das im so gut organisierten Deutschland.) Wieder so viele unbeantwortete Fragen in einem Sachverhalt, der nicht angezweifelt werden darf. Es gab natürliche britische Greuel zuhauf. Absehbar kamen bald auch sowjetische Greuel mit hinzu. Das große Propagandazentrum Bletchley Park blieb ungenutzt?
Translation of Hilken’s comment:
Some Zionists met in Palestine on January 19, 1944, and on the 21st, the Haaretz newspaper published their determined figure of 6 million dead Jews. On July 4, 1944, the story continued in England. Allegedly, four imprisoned Jews and eyewitnesses escaped from the Auschwitz camp, on whose claims the statement is based that Jews are industrially gassed there, namely 12,000 per day. It is strange that Churchill immediately used this statement without checking it and took it up as the greatest crime of all time. There would be no doubt at all about scientific mass destruction; the perpetrators would be hunted down and punished. Why did the Allies not take any military liberation measures at this time? After all, one German city after another has just been reduced to rubble. An airborne corps could have been deployed to the camp and liberated militarily. Then you would have immediately had overwhelming evidence. Why did Churchill miss this unique opportunity? National Socialism would have been quickly eliminated by the German people. It would not have been such a great effort and would hardly have been a risk given the Anglo-American air supremacy achieved. Everything could have been documented photographically and filmically and reported to the world press. The unencrypted communication between the camp command and the Reich Security Main Office could also be read without any problems. Such logistics as the murder of millions of people in the camp could not have remained hidden. Canaris, the master of the betrayal of secrets, who usually revealed every detail to the English, had also remained silent on this. But Churchill refrained from publishing any evidence or even the slightest exemption measure and did not even use the information for a large-scale propaganda initiative. Aerial photographs that could easily have underscored the claims. No aerial reconnaissance by the British? Plumes of smoke. coal heap. spoil heaps. Serpents. Up to 80,000 workers have worked on the manufacture of artificial rubber at the nearby IG Farben BUNA plants in Monowice. You don’t build a huge factory if the goal is to destroy the workers. A contradiction arises here between high-value production in a war-critical industry and industrial killing. Workers must be trained in complex chemical production. These are resources that were already extremely scarce in 1944. This training becomes as pointless as building a factory if murder is the goal. If they don’t get enough food, they can’t provide any work performance. There is a contradiction to the dead labor of people and an increased production of a substance that is fundamentally needed in war. The environment, the population near the camp, was clueless; there were no rumors about this, which is quite remarkable, among the mass movements of Jews that would have assumed this. In the area there were many Catholics who went to confession. Why didn’t the Catholic Church issue an emergency call? Millions of arrivals – and no witness in the neighborhood? Why did the Foreign Office not investigate this at all and the Prime Minister apodictically believed four alleged witnesses? It was one of the best in the world in British intelligence. Where is the documentation of the witness statements? Where is the verification of their statements? Why wasn’t a task force appointed immediately? Why has evidence not been presented to world public opinion without delay? You could have saved yourself the lies and ranting. There would have been plenty of atrocity propaganda with real horrors here. Why did they wait until the Russians arrived at Auschwitz on January 27, 1945, to wait idly? 207 days in which nothing happened and 12,000 people were murdered every day? That would be – based on these figures – almost 2.5 million Auschwitz murders. That would mean that Churchill would have been the accomplice of German murderers. That he had covered up the National Socialists in their criminal activities. Since the British had deciphered the coding, they were also able to read any secret communications from the concentration camps. Unfortunately, there is nothing here either. No paper should have produced such a logistical challenge? No murder orders? No chains of command? (And that in such a well-organized Germany.) Again, so many unanswered questions in a situation that must not be questioned. Natural British abominations abounded. In the foreseeable future, Soviet atrocities were also added. The large propaganda center Bletchley Park remained unused?