The author of this article, Jürgen Graf, is no longer with us. Please see short tribute to this great man: https://freespeechmonika.com/jurgen-graf-15-august-1951-13-january-2025/ Please keep in mind while reading this article, it was written over a quarter century ago. It is just as relevant as ever!
By Jürgen Graf
Published 1997 / republished 2020 on Renegade Tribune (here)
It is a crime because it not only justifies innumerable other crimes, but because it creates a huge mass of hatred, which in turn contains the potential for new crimes.
People whose souls have been drenched in the hatred of the Holocaust Lie must be counted among its victims. This includes the millions of twelve to fifteen-year old school children dragged through the memorials of former concentration camps, often weeping uncontrollably at the atrocity stories and lies vomited up at them.
How much suffering, how much heartbreak, how many tragedies are due to the so called “Holocaust”, this hair-raising Lie of the Century, which the jews invented, crammed down our throats, and have defended tooth and nail, with fines, with abuse, with imprisonment, for over half a century?
It is painful to think of the thousands, indeed tens of thousands, of people who have been humiliated, persecuted, imprisoned, or even executed in the name of this shameless swindle.
It is pathetic to see the once-great German people, having lost its pride, its sense of direction, its self-respect, to such an extent that it no longer dares to defend itself against a flood of slander and is too ashamed to look itself in the face.
One single mention of the “gas chambers”, the extermination of the jews, was enough to justify purging entire cities and provinces of their German population. Almost 17 million people were driven from their homes between 1944 and 1948 in an unbroken series of atrocities during which over two million died.
“After what they did to the jews, they had it coming to them,” is the classical justification.
It is truly disgusting to think of the millions of people all over the world watching Marvin Chomsky, Claude Lanzmann, Steven Spielberg and all the others — Holocaust, Shoa, Schindler’s List, etc. — in the cinemas, on television — and taking it all seriously.
The jews invented a story which they’ve called the Shoa or the Holocaust, and which they now claim is the history of their people.
The Holocaust money-making machine has brought them such tremendous advantages, that they can no longer live without it. But they made one fatal error: the Holocaust swindle is so endlessly absurd that its inventors can only take refuge in a suicide charge; having lost all sense of proportion, they have gone too far and will soon come crashing down.
To suppress all open debate on the subject appears an impossibility in the long run, despite all manner of repression.
From minor explanations to wholesale re-writing, including whole new “Revised Versions”, the profiteers of the myth continue to entangle themselves in increasingly greater numbers of contradictions; the fables of today contradict the fables told yesterday; the defenders of the official version of history are being compelled to make so many concessions that more and more people are starting to wonder about it all.
Doubts expressed in private conversation no longer shock as much as they did a few years ago; it is getting easier for revisionists to gain a hearing.
In brief: for the exterminationists, the time is running out. Increasingly hysterical repression is an unmistakable sign of growing panic.
It is also a sign of weakness.
Instead of listening to the discussion, they simply grab for a truncheon. But how long can they get away with it?
The revisionists must not hope for quick victory; it will not come overnight. They should remember the wisdom expressed in the phrase from the Czech philosopher, Karel Capek, who said:
“Truth must be smuggled. It must be distributed in small doses. A drop here, a drop there — until people get used to it. Not all at once.”
At a time when the Lie appears to be triumphing without hindrance, we would like to close with an optimistic message. We wish to make the following appeal:
All of you, all friends of the truth, both known and unknown, from many European countries, those who, like Günter Deckert and Gottfried Küssel, sit in German and Austrian prisons for “denying the existence of the gas chambers,” or who have been compelled to go into exile like Remer and Rudolf, all persecuted revisionists and nationalists — do not lose your courage, since your struggle against state-ordained lies is not in vain.
Your courage, the sacrifice of a few, will help to free entire nations and peoples, including the German and Russian peoples — from the darkness which has so long covered them.
8 Responses
I don’t know whether to believe in the holocaust and/or the gas chambers – I wasn’t there .
I’m not a jew, I’m an ethnic Pole.
However, I do know one thing for sure: Germany invaded Poland in 1939 and as a result I grew up without knowing my grandfathers, both killed by your ‘hero’ German soldiers.
Warsaw was razed to the ground in 1944 by bombardments and flame-throwers and looked exactly the way Gaza looks now.
That you cannot deny.
So, what about justice for people like me ???
Germany did not want war. We have all been lied to by the jewish-controlled media and school curricula that Germany initiated the war and wanted to take over the world. The war was desired and provoked by the international jew. Yes it is true that Germany invaded Poland in 1939, but that was after thousands of ethnic Germans had been brutally killed in Poland.
Danke, Monika, Sie sagen die Wahrheit!! Ich bewundere Ihren (und Ihres Bruders!) Mut. Gerade lese ich Ihr Buch “Tut mir leid, Mutti!”
Es müßte noch viele solcher Menschen geben, damit Lügen und Vertuschung endlich aufhören.–Gesegnete Advents- und Weihnachtszeit!
Das wünsche ich (83 J.) Ihnen und Ihrem Bruder!
Vielen lieben Dank, Herta. Die Lügen brechen bald unter deren eigenen Gewicht. Ihnen wünsche ich auch eine gesegnete Advents- und Weihnachtszeit.
except Germany would have never invaded poland if poland wasnt murdering a mass number of ethnic germans inside their territory in the most horrific and brutal fashion. History is truly a set of lies agreed upon
I’m sorry for your grandfathers, but your people take over the land from Germany after WW1, than your people started ethnic cleansing against Germans and also murdered a lot of Russians and Ukrainians. Your government at the time did the dirty work for the Great Britain and did not accept any offers for peace or a land corridor to the East-See. Your country launched the military mobilization before Germany and called its men to arms and your generals don’t accept a ceasefire under any circumstances even when Warsaw was surrounded. And no, the city looked not like Gaza, areal footage from this time prove this, the Wehrmacht and Luftwaffe took your military out and their junction points, like bridges and railroads. They spared civil areas and worked with the best precision for the time, no carpet bombing involved ! By the way the modern polish state did not exist before WW1. And at the end of WW2 your people pandered to the murderous Russian commies and events like Katyn, where they killed tens of thousands of your people, you blamed the Germans for and still occupied one third of their country. Germany didn’t started WW1 and WW2, offered most the peace deals in both wars, did no ethnic cleansing and was the nation that tried to save Europe from communism.
…. so what you asking about justice, are you some kind of a knowledge denying reality hating millenial zoomer ?!
Dear Monika,
After reading this article I find myself once again dwelling on certain implied facts about the so-called holocaust. One aspect that comes to mind most often when I do go down this mental pathway concerns the burning of the supposed corpses and the rate in which this was supposedly accomplished, following the established narratives as officially taught. As you know, I have an extensive background and education in architecture, historic preservation and landscape design, in particular, amongst other interests. As any wise, educated person would thus know cognizant of these fields of study, a very important part of one’s education requires a most thorough, well-rounded knowledge of engineering and, in addition, an obvious complete and most thorough understanding of the laws of physics. In my case, more focused on structural engineering, but other off-chutes as well, including electrical, chemical and environmental engineering where they might apply within the realm of my work. Beginning in my high school years where I excelled in both mathematics and physics studies and moving on throughout my adult years of work, anything and everything I do that requires design and/or building construction finds me naturally drawing upon this now innate, established and well-tuned, well-rounded inner knowledge. Thus, when I come upon a story line that does not fit or work within these “LAWS OF NATURE” I will find myself questioning and seeking a viable solution. So, it is with the so-called “official narrative” as to how this supposed holocaust event took place that I am again reminded that this whole story line is one enormous “pile of cow manure”, for lack of a better and more honest (and delicate) way of phrasing it.
This brings to mind a personal experience of mine dating back to the late winter-early spring of 2000. Please bare with me as this does apply to the discussion at hand.
It was then I lost my best friend due to an extensive, nearly year-long illness. Gary and I met approximately a decade earlier at an historic cafe and bar whose restoration I had previously overseen several years prior. (It had become a regular weekly habit of mine to visit that establishment in order to participate in their Saturday billiard tournaments where I regularly participated, also featuring a delicious free buffet for the regulars.) Situated next to each other at the bar awaiting for our turns at the tables a pleasant conversation developed that quickly made me aware of this man’s exceptional knowledge of many worldly subject matters. It seems Gary had once studied for four years to become a Catholic priest, later dropping out. This education was most extensive and exposed him to what we would today call a very in-depth “classical education”. His knowledge about classical architecture, art, music, literature, etc. astounded me and thus we soon became the very best of friends as we shared so much in common. At last, here was a fellow man with whom I could share conversations with the deepest of intensity. I also became well aware of his gift for fine woodworking and model building. Thus, in time, I often involved his skill sets in various historic restoration projects.
When I became well aware of Gary’s advancing illness he confided in me his desire that I be the executor of his Will and that he wished to be cremated. With much trepidation, I agreed. Upon his death I attended to all of the details required, arranging for the disposition of his belongings and affairs, closing out his accounts and arranging for the terms of his will. After both the hospital and coroner released his remains to me and all the necessary papers signed his body was delivered to the crematorium.
Now follows why I have burdened you with all this information. When I went to retrieve Gary’s ashes at the crematorium, upon accepting his remains and signing the release papers I requested of the director if I could sit down with him so he could personally explain to me what all was involved in the cremation process, me stating my interest being essentially personal. (But you can probably figure out now where I was going with this story.) For what lasted just over an hour he described in great detail, using (at my request) my late friends personal situation, as a framework for our discussion.
As Gary was 6’-0” tall and just shy of 220 pounds in weight, the director explained to me his incineration had taken just over four and a half hours. Thereafter, his ashes were retrieved and some remains still not fully reduced to ash were again broken up and re-incinerated in order to fully reduce the remains into a fine ash powder. This is the long and short of it. Also, towards the end of our talk I was allowed to speak to the engineer on duty and more fully see some of the inner workings of the facility and the large “ovens” where the process took place. These ovens burn at extremely high temperatures and are much more advanced over earlier and more primitive systems from just a few years earlier.
Thereafter, upon returning to my former urban home and placing Gary’s remains in a closet for the time being – not sure when I wanted to dispose of them according to Gary’s wishes – I retired to my garden terrace with a glass of wine. I sat there wrapped in a shaw contemplating and processing all that information shared with me by both the director and the engineer, comparing it back and forth to all the official holocaust narratives written about the cremation stories I had previously read over numerous years. As you can surely imagine now none of this made any sense once my technical mind kicked in to overdrive. The longer I sat their pondering the story lines, the supposed holocaust survivor’s “eye-witness” accounts, the colored smoke, the time frames, etc. I found myself becoming quite bitter with regards to what was becoming ever-more clear to me as a gigantic hoax. To my surprise this one particular tragedy in my personal life involving the loss of a dear, close friend was what came to have served as the supreme catalyst towards a much deeper and more fully pronounced reasoning of this matter. Boy, did I feel like a chump.
Since my teen years I have been well aware of so many of the official (retarded) lies with regards to the “good war” and the “evil nazis”, as shared with me by my late uncle who lived through all of that “hell on earth”. I was still processing the paradox of the holocaust narrative, with most of it making no real sense to me. That one day made it so very clear to me there was no way you could shove three bodies into a much more primitive (and vastly less efficient) coal-fired brick oven and then open the oven door and scrape out the ashes of three fully incinerated bodies twenty minutes later, and repeat this process over and over again on an industrial scale. Considering the modest number of cremation ovens, the constant need for repairs and rebuilding from supposed overuse, the prolific need for gigantic mountains of coal to use for burning; even high-altitude recognizant flights by the Allies over the camps show no evidence of this.
To close, I took it upon myself to pull out my trusty old “slide rule” and undertake to calculate just how long it would take to cremate at Auschwitz upwards of a million bodies over a three year period, working day and night. Ideally, with those fully functioning and less efficient ovens and plenty of fossil fuel, further taking into account numerous positive and negative variables always in play, plus the fact it takes nearly five hours to fully incinerate a human body (by todays standards), I calculate it would take just over seventy years to complete the task. Enough said.
Frederick
Thank you Frederick, once again, for another interesting story and for sharing your insights. This is a valuable contribution.
All the best,
Monika